Run-Down Forums Forum Index Run-Down Forums

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch
 
Run-Down Forums Forum Index
Training Talk
quick fix or long term progress
Post new topic   Reply to topic

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Run-Down Forums Forum Index -> Training Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Paul
Olympic Medalist
Olympic Medalist


Joined: 28 Apr 2002
Posts: 1610
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2002 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DG: where do you coach at, if that's not too personal??

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
training2run
Varsity
Varsity


Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 253
Location: CyberSpace

PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2002 2:12 pm    Post subject: holding pace Reply with quote

First a question or two to DG. When you refer to a VO2 maximum intensity run, are you speaking of a pulse rate right at the upper edge of the aerobic level, just before going anerobic?

Second, what the heck is the difference between a hard anaerobic workout and a speed workout?

Finally DG, thank you for putting what I do in terms of meters. 100,000 sounded so impressive, until I changed it back into Ks, and then miles (62).

Now to Dan: I can hardly believe it, *AGAIN WE ARE IN AGREEMENT!*
Quote:
the goal of racing is to run the specified distance the fastest, not to see who can hold a pace the longest.
That is why I (and those who follow my system) *never* attempt to hold a pace in the early part of a marathon.

We *always* begin under pace, then gradually build speed throughout the run, with the 15-20 the fastest five mile split, and the final mile usually the fastest mile split.

It isn't what you do at the beginning that counts towards the laurel wreath, it's what you've done when you cross the finish. Mad Dog Mike www.training2run.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Distance_Guru
World Class
World Class


Joined: 09 Mar 2002
Posts: 1280
Location: Nebraska

PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2002 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dan is your school NAIA, NCAA D3 or D2. Were D2 and the way we get regional spots at nationals is every region gets two berths (which is more than some of them deserve) and then for every team your region puts in the top eight you get another berth. With Adams State and Western State in our region we are almost garunteed 4 berths and almost always there is at least one other team that is good enough to get in the top 8. Heck last year the women had six berths to nationals.

Mike when I say VO2 max pace I'm refering to a pace between 3000 to 10,000 meter race pace (depending on the length of intervals and race being trained for). Or 90%-95% of maximal HR in men 95%-98% in women.

And I think I said hard aerobic runs. In other words a regular aerobic run where the athletes take it upon themselves to run harder than they have to. As for hard anaerobic running that can be one of two things speed or lactate tolerance. Speed (at least my definition of it) is repeats of distances 400 meters and shorter at paces of 800 meter race pace and faster with a full recovery. Lactate tolerance is workouts made up or rither short intervals done in sets with short rest between repeats and near full rest between sets or repeats of 400-600 meters run at nearly maximal effort with full recovery.
_________________
Time is the fire in which we burn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2002 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, that's right. I thought you were DIII, not DII. The school I *was* at is NCAA DIII. DIII's setup is that each region gets one auto team, plus an additional team spot for each team that placed in the top 16 at nationals the previous year, with a max of 5 teams per region. Since our region had one women's team and two men's teams in the top 16, it will send 2 women's and 3 men's teams, respectively, next year. There's a similar rule for individuals, with I think one auto for any individual in the top 7 (?) not on a qualifying team, plus an extra individual spot for every non-team individual placing in the top 10 or so at nationals the previous year. It starts to get a bit confusing...

Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Distance_Guru
World Class
World Class


Joined: 09 Mar 2002
Posts: 1280
Location: Nebraska

PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2002 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's alright I'm still not sure how many individuals our region gets. I think it's two but I'm not sure. And now they've added a rule that if you get into the top ten in the region as an individual you go to nationals no matter how many individual non-quailifiers there are infront of you. All I can say for certain is it's best to be on a good team because those with indivduals it's really hard to know who your raceing to go to nationals, with teams it's a little easier to tell.
_________________
Time is the fire in which we burn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
training2run
Varsity
Varsity


Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 253
Location: CyberSpace

PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2002 3:48 pm    Post subject: VO2 Max - ah hah Reply with quote

So, it seems, what you call VO2 Max, is about what I'd call "B*lls Against the Wall." My term is so much more colorful Very Happy ...and it's not confusing.

I guess VO2 Max is what I do at the finish of every training run - regardless of length? I certainly get the heart-rate up there pushing the envelope. Mad Dog (who's is learning the jargon Surprised ) www.training2run.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Distance_Guru
World Class
World Class


Joined: 09 Mar 2002
Posts: 1280
Location: Nebraska

PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2002 4:13 pm    Post subject: Re: VO2 Max - ah hah Reply with quote

training2run wrote:
So, it seems, what you call VO2 Max, is about what I'd call "B*lls Against the Wall." My term is so much more colorful Very Happy ...and it's not confusing.


I like that. When I was in college we would always do these workouts on thursdays, we called them relgion thursdays. Because in the middle of these workouts you'd be praying to God, Allah, Buddah, Jesus, Genish, and any other higher power you could think of just to make that evil man with the stop watch let you catch you breath.


p.s. I apologize in advance if I ofended anyone by either leaving out or misspelling the name of your deity.
_________________
Time is the fire in which we burn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
training2run
Varsity
Varsity


Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 253
Location: CyberSpace

PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2002 4:54 pm    Post subject: The man with the stopwatch Reply with quote

Joe actually does his time trials on days when he's not training with me - just so he doesn't have to deal with me and the fng watch.

You left out Vishnu, Jehovah, Mammon (a personal favorite) and the god of runners, Hermes. Mad Dog Mike www.training2run.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
SD_Runner
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2002 9:27 am    Post subject: What do you consider mileage? Reply with quote

Dan,

This is mainly for you. How many miles would you consider high mileage? For a 4:10 miler, 4:30 miler, 5:00 miler. How many miles do you run in your speed based training? Some speed based training can be upwards of 70 mpw. Just some things I am wondering before I put in my 2 cents.


Jesse
Back to top
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2002 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I consider 70 miles per week sufficient for anything up to 5k for serious runners (more than enough for most collegiate cross country runners), so that would be pretty high for a miler. With sufficient quality, 50 is about where I would peg the upper end.

I wouldn't really differentiate mileage levels based on race time, as that's more an indicator of capability than ability to handle a given workload.

Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
training2run
Varsity
Varsity


Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 253
Location: CyberSpace

PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2002 10:04 am    Post subject: Dan, WOW!!! Reply with quote

Dan, I had no idea that milers ran 50 miles a week in training, or 5Kers 70mpw. That's a revelation Surprised !

Am I correct in guessing that they are running two or three times a day, fairly short (of course that's relative) each run?

With that sort of training, they could (if they were nutz like me), run a nice marathon by merely working up to a weekly lonnnnnnnnnng run. Mad Dog Mike www.training2run.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2002 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I consider that the upper end, so not everyone would be running that much. That would probably consist of a long run a week of 10-13 miles, a couple 6-7 type easy days, and a few hard interval sessions totaling maybe 4-5 miles, with probably several of the days having 4 mile morning runs. That all depends, of course, on whether it is a training or racing phase.

Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
training2run
Varsity
Varsity


Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 253
Location: CyberSpace

PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2002 10:33 am    Post subject: Sounds Good Reply with quote

Dan: That sounds like a good week: covers all the bases.

Would that be for a miler or a 5Ker, or both?

Looks to me, that by building the 13 mile long run up to 20, over nine weeks, and then tapering, a person could run a pretty good marathon on that program. Mad Dog Mike www.training2run.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dan
Chief Pontificator
Chief Pontificator


Joined: 22 Mar 1999
Posts: 9334
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2002 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That would be geared toward a well-trained miler, but it would probably be enough for most 5k runners to do reasonably well on, at least as a starting point.

Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Hammer
Varsity
Varsity


Joined: 17 Jan 2002
Posts: 385
Location: New Mexico

PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2002 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dan and DG- Regardless of the style of training (speed based and mileage based) don't you think that the life long runner would increase speed mileage and aerobic mileage???

So if either of these sytems are done poorly (for 1 season) the runner would experience the quick fix results.

I used to talk about training the distance runners was simmilar to training a medieval army: One needs knowlege of all of the weapons (bow, shield, sword, spear and so on; the distance runners needs: speed, endurance, stamina, strength, confidence and so on. The more successful an athlete is we will find that he or she is strong in all areas not just one or two, and therefore a coach needs to develop all areas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Run-Down Forums Forum Index -> Training Talk All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group